Comical Politics

Free-Ride Given to Muslim death squad by American News Organizations

The American mainline news organizations have been the main source of legitimizing, covering, and hiding the greatest threat to America and to Americanism: American Islamist.  The American media has been hiding and covering for terrorist Muslims, which is an exceeding large majority of young Muslims in this Country. 

The mainline news organizations are afraid of political correctness and therefore turn their eyes and ears away when Muslim terrorism happens, even to one of their own.

This is the case of the Oakland, California newspaper editor, Chauncey Bailey, who was gunned down my Muslim terrorist on the street.  There is no question of who did it or why.   It was certified home grown Muslims and he was gunned down broad daylight for investigating the terrorist activity of these Muslims.  He leaves behind a wife and two children.

This is very reminiscent, almost a repeat, of the assassination of the Dutch filmmaker for daring to make a documentary critical of Islam, although it was accurate.

Assassination of newspaper reporters is rare in the United States.  It is crossing a line that make America by definition uncivilized, a third-world banana republic.  Nonetheless, the news organizations of America would not report the story.

It was finally broken an made public by newspapers in England.  Nonetheless it was still ignored until conservative talk shows and bloggers came out and told America the truth.  The truth that this was a Muslim terrorist attack that assassinated a newspaper reporter. 

The first timid reports in the American press began to appear; but, they would not mention that the assassination was by Muslim terrorists.  It would seem like an unrelated death, even possibly a day-to-day murder that happens in Oakland.  No this one was different.  It was the day to day killing by Muslim terrorist that happen all the time all over the world.

Finally the Chicago Tribune newspaper wrote about the story in today's paper.  A front page story, a story about the gunning down of an American newspaper man for the story he was investigating.  An event so rare and in the interest of the newspaper people because it was one of their own.  But it was Muslim terrorism so all civilized norms go out the window.  The Chicago Tribune took over three weeks to report the story that was readily available in England two weeks ago.  The newsroom staff of the Chicago Tribune should be ashamed of themselves; but they were finally embarrassed and shamed enough by the conservative press and radio to print the following story:

Chicago Tribune story on Oakland newspaper editor gunned down by Muslims

Remember it has been over thirty years since a black newspaper reporter has been killed investigating a story, this is rare.  We all should be scared, worried, and on watch for all Muslim activities.  They need to prove their legitimacy and their willingness to live in a civilized society; it is not the duty of the rest of us to "presume" their tolerance until proved otherwise.

That is how the courts work and will work for the Muslim assassin; it is not how a civilized society works.

Australia has Found the Guts

Debate in Australia.
This is true and can be checked at:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/religion/australia.asp

Muslims who want to live under Islamic Sharia law were told on Wednesday to get out of Australia, as the government targeted radicals in a bid to head off potential terror attacks.  A day after a group of mainstream Muslim leaders pledged loyalty to Australia and her Queen at a special meeting with Prime Minister John Howard, he and his Ministers made it clear that extremists would face a crackdown.  Treasurer Peter Costello, seen as heir apparent to Howard, hinted that some radical clerics could be asked to leave the country if they did not accept that Australia was a secular state, and its laws were
made by parliament.  "If those are not your values, if you want a country which has Sharia law or a theocratic state, then Australia is not for you", he said on National Television "I'd be saying to clerics
who are teaching that there are two laws governing people in Australia: one the Australian law and another Islamic law that is false. If you can't agree with parliamentary law, independent courts, democracy, and
would prefer Sharia law and have the opportunity to go to another country, which practices it, perhaps, then, that's a better option", Costello said.  Asked whether he meant radical clerics would be forced
to leave, he said those with dual citizenship could possibly be asked to move to the other country. Education Minister Brendan Nelson later told reporters that Muslims who did not want to accept local values should "clear off. 

Basically people who don't want to be Australians, and who don't want, to live by Australian values and understand them, well then, they can basically clear off", he said.  Separately, Howard angered some
Australian Muslims on Wednesday by saying he supported spy agencies monitoring the nation's mosques.  Quote:  "IMMIGRANTS, NOT AUSTRALIANS, MUST ADAPT. Take It Or Leave It.  I am tired of this nation worrying about whether we are offending some individual or their culture. Since the terrorist attacks on Bali, we have experienced a surge in patriotism by the majority of Australians."  "However, the dust from the attacks had barely settled when the 'politically correct' crowd began complaining about the possibility that our patriotism was offending others. I am not against immigration, nor do I hold a grudge against anyone who is seeking a better life by coming to Australia."  "However, there are a few things that those who have recently come to our country, and apparently some born here, need to understand."  "This idea of Australia being a multi-cultural community has served only to dilute our sovereignty and our national identity. And as Australians, we have our own culture, our own society, our own language and our own lifestyle."  "This culture has been developed over two centuries of struggles, trials
and victories by millions of men and women who have sought freedom"  "We speak mainly ENGLISH, not Spanish, Lebanese, Arabic, Chinese, Japanese, Russian, or any other language. Therefore, if you wish to become part of our society .. Learn the language!"

"Most Australians believe in God. This is not some Christian, right wing, political push, but a fact, because Christian men and women, on Christian principles, founded this nation, and this is clearly
documented.   It is certainly appropriate to display it on the walls of our schools. If God offends you, then I suggest you consider another part of the world as your new home, because God is part of our culture."  "We will accept your beliefs, and will not question why.  All we ask is that you accept ours, and live in harmony and peaceful enjoyment with us."  "If the Southern Cross offends you, or you don't like "A Fair Go", then you should seriously consider a move to another part of this planet.  We are happy with our culture and have no desire to change, and we really don't care how you did things where you came from. By all means, keep your culture, but do not force it on others.

"This is OUR COUNTRY, OUR LAND, and OUR LIFESTYLE, and we will allow you every opportunity to enjoy all this. But once you are done complaining, whining, and griping about Our Flag, Our Pledge, Our
Christian beliefs, or Our Way of Life, I highly encourage you take advantage of one other great Australian freedom, 'THE RIGHT TO LEAVE'."  "If you aren't happy here then LEAVE. We didn't force you to come here.  You asked to be here. So accept the country YOU accepted."

The Australians have found the guts to "speak truth to power" and to end the political correctness fostered on Americans by overblown intellectuals.  This is the courage that neither party candidates for President are showing in the United States; but it is what the people want to hear.  It is time to end the debate on immigrants and Muslims.  The value of multi-culturalism and diversity is the "big lie" of the past twenty-years.  The United States has never been a multi-cultural society in the way that it is being implemented and there is no evidence that there is any positive, social or economic, value to multi-culturalism or diversity.  The problem is the same; none acceptance of the Judeo-Christian morality and Anglican norms.  Their culture is anti-American that is why they are here not in their home country.  More significantly and often overlooked is that unlike other immigrant waves in the past, both of these new groups are overwhelming in numbers and procreation.  Like locusts they are and will overwhelm every culture and society they come in contact with just by shear numbers.

For future action and attitudes we need to take a page from the Australians and learn what it is to stand up for one's self.  We lost the war on terrorism the day after the war when President George Bush made the United States into a false multi-cultural society by raising Islam, alone, to an equal level with the Judeo-Christian tradition.  This the Australians know better.

As documented by the Chicago Tribune last year and by the FBI in their ongoing investigations and indictments the center of the radicalism of Islam in the U.S. is Chicago.  Dearborn, Michigan, with a larger Muslim (but older) community, may have issues, some of which one may disagree with, but most of that Muslim community there consists of American-Muslims that considers themselves American first, with all that it means.  (In some cases more American than some "American" intellectuals of multi-culturalism we all know.)

The radical Muslim's and the illegal Hispanic's goal, intentional or accidental, is to end all the values that make America worth while and worth fighting and dying for.  It is one thing to criticize policy, which all Americans (residents or citizens), are encouraged to do; it is another thing to demand that the very culture and society that you came to by choice change to fit the society and culture you ran away from.

One, it is empirically wrong that there is not an American standing above all else.  Two, it is immoral; becaue the level of acceptable morality in practice in America by far exceeds all other countries combined.  (This does not say it is perfect; only relatively so.)  Three, it is not polite, which is the Anglo-Saxon way of saying shut-up or get out of my house.

Purdue's Finger to Hoosier Tax Payers

When I was an undergraduate student at Purdue University, West Lafayette, the one outstanding symbol of the University's attitude was its mile-high smoke stack. This smoke stack built of bricks seemed to rise to the heavens and represented the swashbuckling attitude of the University and its Boilermaker students. It was affectionately known by all as Purdue's "finger-to-the-world."

The smoke stack was a vestige of the decades in which the coal fired heating plant was in the center of campus with the world's shortest train line to carry the coal to the plant. Our attitude, which the smoke stack represented, is that not only were we engineers and scientists and other type of brain heads we could still party with the best of them, our men were the most handsome and our women were smarter and prettier.  Even though our courses and degrees were the toughest in the Big-Ten, our teams, football under Coach Jack Mollenkopf and Basketball under Coach George King, would beat any of them.

The smoke-stack was Purdue's finger to the world because in spite of what everyone thought, we Boilermakers were a great contribution to the State of Indiana. Most of the people associated with the University were committed to the Hoosier State and believed in it; not the carpetbaggers we have today.

The smoke-stack was such a point of pride for decades of alumni, that when it was torn down for the more politically correct clock tower, the bricks were sold to alumni and friends to raise money for scholarships.

Now the carpetbaggers have given a new meaning to Purdue's finger-to-the-world. Purdue has flipped the proverbial finger at the very Hoosier taxpayers who support it and for whose benefit Purdue exists. It accomplished this by throwing a lavish over one million dollar party on itself in the middle of the worst tax crisis that Hoosier taxpayers and public officials are going through.

The party, reminiscent of French royalty just before the French revolution, was held in Mollenkopf indoor football arena to celebrate the completion of the $1.7 Billion fund-raising campaign. The party was first reported by the Lafayette Journal and Courier Newspaper (click on the link to see the original story), and it outlines what other items of educational value this money could have been spent on.

The newspaper article only reports $576,778 being spent. But this is very misleading. This amount is only the direct contracts that are known to be signed. This did not include indirect costs and direct State taxpayer funded costs that were included in the festivities but are lumped with other regular payments from State tax money. For example, once a contract is signed a group of people have to administer and manage them. Purdue knows that because it has many contracts with the Federal Government and it knows that there is about a 20% internal administrative cost added to these contracts for "running" them. This would right away add an additional $115,000. We are now up to $700,000.

Who paid for the electricity, water, telephones etc.? The money for these all comes from the University utility bill paid by you and I as Hoosier Tax Payers. Who paid to resurface the arena and the parking lots?  Who paid to direct traffic and handle the traffic jams?  The parking costs, and most of all the thousands of dollars of tax payer funded people time that was utilized, like those people needed to direct traffic, can not be separated from non-direct State funds. As a matter of fact the whole thing was paid by public money.

The University said that half the money came from the Purdue Research Foundation and half from the money raised in the fund raiser. All of the money is public money and belongs to Hoosier Tax Payers. Purdue University Carpetbaggers are somehow renaming monies raised in the name of Purdue University as private money because it was written to the Purdue Foundation. Most of the donors did not know of this scam. When they write their check to the Foundation it is a slush fund for the elite of the University; not to be confused with monies used for the good of the State of Indiana or even Purdue University. This in spite of the fact that the funds were raised solely under the name of Purdue University and under the banner of supporting a great Hoosier institution and consequently the people of that great State.

But no, the Foundation money is for the benefit of the Foundation. It is one of those trick organizations, such as they have in East Chicago, that the Indiana Attorney General is trying to get control over information and mis-spending in these quasi-private entities. Essentially they receive all of their money under the guise of being a public institution with public fiduciary responsibility; but, they spend their monies like a private for profit organization and insist on privacy and lack of transparency in their dealing because they claim they are "private".   The major activity of the Purdue Foundation is owning land and property in the State and remember they do not pay property taxes.  Guess who is stuck with the bill?  Me and you, the Hoosier Tax Payers!!!

The party that was thrown was for only 600 people.  You can do your own math at how elitist these people are for what they cost us Hoosier Tax Payers for each person.  The most common "rationale" for why the party was needed is that the people who gave the money expected it.  Nonsense.  People who give money in the millions do not expect a party; they get their names on buildings and endowed professorships.  In reality, the party was for the University higher-ups.  Why?  Because they could.  Just like the French Royalty before the revolution.

By the way do not be mistaken, not only was this party an embarrassment to Purdue and Indiana, it was an international embarrassment as it was even covered in the Chronicle of Higher Education, Party Tab for Purdue.

The money that was raised is doing nothing for the Hoosier Tax Payer because not a penny is going to reduce the burden placed on us.  For example, over $160 million was raised to pay for endowed professorships.  Did any of that reduce the demand Purdue made on the Hoosier Tax Payer at the legislature?  NO.  Purdue's endowment, the money it has to invest and use the interest for anything it wants, was over $1.5 billion in 2006.  Why has Purdue's burden on the Hoosier tax payer not been reduced, ever?

The reason is that the Purdue Foundation, like its sister the IU Foundation, are there to serve the "private" interests of the people in power in the Universities.  There is no accountability either in the Foundations nor for that matter on the Board of Trustees of Purdue or IU.  What have they done for you, Mr. Hoosier Tax Payer, lately?  Nothing, except have fun themselves at your expense. 

The numbers show that Purdue and IU have done nothing to stem the brain-drain out of the State.  They have done nothing to stem the employment exit out of the State.  To be realistic, the amount of tax dollars they consume, West Lafayette and Bloomington may very well be an overall drain on the State's economy.  The first quarter of 2007, Indiana was number two in the country in states loosing jobs.  Where were the big Universities?  Oh, I forgot, planning their million dollar party.

The number one state in job loss was Ohio.  They realized that this was occurring to a great extent because the universities were out of control and contributed to themselves and not to the state they were a part of.  As a consequence the Ohio Governor and legislature revamped the whole State of Ohio's higher education system of 36+ campuses into a more coordinated, responsive, and transparent system responsive to the people of Ohio.  This is their new web site: The University System of Ohio.  Indiana now has a chance to become number one in the Country in job loss while our universities party away.

Whether you think the universities are thumbing their noses at us Hoosier Tax Payers or "just" giving us the finger, it is time to take control back and make them accountable in totality; for every penny spent and how it benefits the Great State of Indiana, period.