Comical Politics

'Global Warming’ Fear is about Money Not Science

That today's university research into so called "global warming" is singularly tied to the money it makes for its proponents, has been the presentation that I have made to students for almost ten years. 

Naturally not only has the faculty not taken me seriously, the university itself has tried to get rid of me through various, unsuccessful, attacks.  Read the following to understand why:

'Global Warming’ Fear is about Money Not Science - Godfather Politics.

What all the "scientists" argue is not only that the weather is changing -- that is a fact since time immemorial and there is no debate on this.  Today's money-grubbing university researchers have to add the factor that it is MAN MADE.  Otherwise, why bother.  It is the later fact for which there is no evidence and it is the one that brings in the money to universities.

As has been true for the larger part of the Twentieth Century, scientists in their own utilitarian interests continue to make up stories to gain themselves money and prestige.  At one time this was only argued for the social sciences, or even worse the private sector, but now we know that the real money is in fake science, engineering, and technology.

Related articles

• 'Global Warming' Fear is about Money Not Science (godfatherpolitics.com)
• Czech Pres. Vaclav Klaus: Global warming believers 'arguments & ambitions are very similar to those we used to live with decades ago under Communism...they want to control the whole of society' (climatedepot.com)
• Green 'drivel' exposed. The godfather of global warming lowers the boom on climate change hysteria (investmentwatchblog.com)
• Busted! Leaked emails snag global-warming alarmists (wnd.com)

Hillary Clinton Compares Islamic Violence to Christianity

The pro-Islam stand of America's Secretary of State cannot be just an accident that all of sudden happened.  This is especially true with her anti-Christian retoric.  Who wrote this for Hillary Clinton?  Her aide Huma Abadin?

Hillary Compares Islamic Violence to Christianity.

Congresswoman Michelle Bachmann is right.  This needs investigating and further questioning.  Are these "new" ideas of Secretary Clinton?  And if so, why?  Why is Clinton finding that this is an opportune time to beat up on Christianity?  Anyone who things that in this attack the Muslim Brotherhood does not "reside" is being naive or blind or both.

Bachmann's Allegations on Clinton - Jewish Defense - Why?

Congresswoman Bachmann is attacked for asking questions about Muslim Brotherhood at the heart of American National power -- Huma Abadin as the number one aid to Hillary Clinton, America's Secretary of State. 

Allegations on Clinton ... JPost - Jewish World - Jewish Features.

In the article above, who is doing the attacking: old line Jewish organizations who still believe that Islam is just a run of the mill religion -- the religion of peace.  That is just factually not the case.  As America and many other countries have found out, Islam is at the center of all attacks on the West and the modern world. 

What Congresswoman Bachmann brought up should be lauded, not attacked under the umbrella of political correctness.  The same attacks that are being made on Bachmann today, the political correctness and Islam is a peaceful religion, got us 9/11.  How can Bachmann be criticized?   Have we really learned nothing from our past 12 years of negative experiences.

There is every reason for Jews to question Clinton and support Congresswoman Bachmann?  Who has consistently supported Israel?  Not Clinton -- as First Lady she embraced the PLO and Arafat.  As Secretary of State, she has pushed Israel and its leaders impolitely more than even Obama himself has.   Why would anyone think that somehow Huma Abadin is beyond reproach?

Abadin's whole family is part of the Muslim Brotherhood.  Is it not a fair question to ask: how has she distanced herself from them?  If she has.  Anyone else who would have done what she has, including marrying a Jew, would have had a death fatwa issued against them at least once.  Why not her?  It would only have happened if she is of value to the Muslim Brotherhood where she is -- and she is of value to them.   Congresswoman Bachmann only asked the question of how much value.  That this is deserving of investigation.

The mainstream Jewish organizations are so afraid of being considered as being politically incorrect that they are willing, maybe unconciously, to risk the Jewish State for their belongingness. 

The simple question for Huma Abadin is what is you Islamic affiliation?  If there are any, which tenants do you accept?  For most Muslims in the world the tenants would include Islamic anti-Jewishness and anti-Americanism.  How is she different when her whole family support these very tenants?  Why, Senator McCain, is this question not allowed? 

What if Chick-fil-A was Owned by Muslims? The Culture Wars are Real.

The culture wars are alive and well.  In spite of reams of articles and books attempting to argue otherwise, reality creeps in to show us how divided as a nation we remain.  The newness of this culture war is reflected by a complete divide between those who accept the values of America and those who do not.  Recent studies have further shown that as students graduate from high school there acceptance of the First Amendment and tolerance is extremely low.  What is threatening to our national values is that these same students, interviewed after completion of college, further reduce their tolerance in their support of free speech and freedom of conscience.

Yesterday was Chick-fil-A appreciation day.  Throughout the United States hundred of thousands of supporters came out to support the argument against gay marriage rights of the CEO of Chick-fil-A.  What he essentially said is that there is no place in America for marriage between the same gender.  It is an oxymoron.  This cultural division is not only reflected in this singular event; but also in all the opinion polls.  In addition, wherever it has been voted on, the majority of Americans have rejected "gay marriage."  What is important to understand is that Chick-fil-A's CEO and the majority of Americans reject marriage between people of the same gender; but, most of them DO NOT reject the extension of civil rights to gays.

BUT, what if the CEO of Chick-fil-A was a practicing Muslim?  First, he would have to agree with everything that the Christian CEO of Chick-fil-A said about "gay marriage" as being an affront to G-d.   But in Islam it is more than that.  To be an affront to G-d is a blasphemy that requires the punishment of death.  For Islam, under Sharia Law, the only answer to being gay is death.  The issue of "gay marriage" does not even arise in Islam because it lacks any basis in reality.   You cannot have a religious acceptance of what does not exist. 

For Muslims, the solution to the problem of "gayness" is the end of any civil rights, i.e. First Amendment rights, to those tainted individuals.  Christians can say, in the worst case, "hate the sin; but, love the sinner."  There is not comparable concept in Islam.   In Islam, as is practiced by law in ALL Islamic countries, to be gay is to be dead, either by law or by family -- the religion does not care.  This is a far cry from debating the issue of how is marriage to be defined. 

The sole "evil" that Chick-fil-A is accused of is not having a gay acceptable definition of marriage.  Chick-fil-A's understanding of marriage is supported by over half of all Americans -- nothing strange about it.  But, all Muslim CEO's belief must be that gays must be eradicated.  (From a theological point of view, there is probably some difference about how gays would be treated if one is a Muslim gay or an infidel gay.)  Nonetheless, the perspective of a Muslim CEO concerning gays remains death or castration.

The Shariah Law of Islam is not the central point.  The significance is the selective treatment by politicians in the United States of Christians as opposed to Muslims.   This hypocrisy is illustrated remarkably well by the mayors of Boston, Philadelphia, Chicago, etc.  The liberal Democrats continues their hypocritical rejection of all things Christian and a love affair with all things Muslim. 

If one is going to have an issue with what a Christian head of a corporation believes and makes known publicly, then there is no basis whatsoever for allowing any business to be carried on by a Muslim who has any religious belief and practices.  When the Mayor of Chicago, Rahm Emanuel, said "the values of Chick-fil-A's CEO are not Chicago's values," what does he say about all the Muslims running businesses and corporations in Chicago whose religion calls and demands the denial of all civil rights to gays?  Are these Chicago's values?  To be consistent, the Mayors and the Democratic Party needs to reject all practicing Muslims.  Or alternatively, have Muslims give up Sharia Law as being inherently un-American.

The liberal Democrats love affair with Islam will continue to America's detriment.  Christianity will continue to be denied and demonized by these same liberals.  The fight for factual honesty and the end of hypocrisy must be joined and fought by all who believe in the legitimacy of the First Amendment to the American Constitution.

Related articles

Chick-Fil-A packed as supporters turn out

Chick-Fil-A Appreciation Day: Half A Million To Show Up At Restaurants

Tweet of the Day: Chick-fil-A and Barack Obama

Boston Mayor: Chick-fil-A, Move Along

Americans flock to support Chick-fil-A