Comical Politics

The End of Chicago's Police Chief

If he had not retired he would have to be fired.  If nothing else to show that the new Mayor is doing something.  That is what Chicago police have been like under the Democrats and their so called police chief.  Always have been ever since the Dalys who were kind of Democrats but not when it came to Chicago.  Remember there is nothing that is American that the Democrats have not destroyed. Then came the real Democrats, after the Daleys, to Chicago and they are still there.  Evey one who can is leaving Chicago and Cook County where the Democrats reign.  Most Blacks are not bright enough, there are exceptions, to see that they are and have been taken advantage of by the Democrats for their, the Democrats, personnel gain.  That is ALL the Democrats care about.

The police department under this superintend or the previous one have not done anything, and I mean anything, to change any criminality in Chicago.  It have only gotten worse, much worse.  The Chicago police department have been unable to kick butt and take names from the people who should not walk the ground of the City of Chicago.  That is one of the big reason people are leaving.  The policing in Chicago is worse than bad.  You do not go for any week-end without a lot of people being shot and killed.  Thanks to the police superintendent and the Mayor of Chicago.  It is good he set a retirement date so that the Mayor would not have to fire him.  He is so bad; not one wants him.  But let us not forget he is a minority.  The white superintendent before him did not do any better.  It is all the Mayor's, all of them, fault.  NYC is following in its footsteps.  He had to be fired because the Democrats are so so bad.  They have never ever cared about what is happening to minorities of any kind.  All Democrats care about is their own ability to hold power and make money for themselves.  Nothing else.  I would challenge anyone to show me where they cared about anything their big mouths spoke about.  Including killing of minorities in Chicago.  Remember, Obama never came to Chicago.  This is unlike Trump.

It is all very funny what the Democrats continue to do to what was once America's premier cities.

Why Obama is Such a Funny, if not Sad, Politician?

Read what the funny man, who claimed to be President of the United States, is now doing for all our disbelief in him, and American politicians, and our funny bone by his own acceleration.  Regretfully it is what we believed all of our politicians were, thieves and charlatans, has now been proven our without a shadow of a doubt and there is no going back.  Just read:

http://www.smh.com.au/comment/barack-obama-seemed-different-but-hes-just-another-moneygrubbing-politician-20170427-gvu4c4.html

If I did not see this myself, I could not make this up.  I always knew he was a fraud.  He was as they say a politician who never ever did anything in his life.  Ever, and it can not be longer than that.  He still to this day has not.  That is still so sad.  We had our first Black president and who hurt the most?  This is truly funny, the Blacks.  Again, you cannot make this up.  

Who did the best?  The gays.  Make up your own funny story of why this is the case.  

How could we ever, ever have a president like Barack Obama?  Only the demise of the American people can explain it.  History will for ever write that the end of the United States as a beacon to other countries, the new Israel, died with the election of Barack Obama and the end of Americanism.  It is, that is Americanism, and Anglo-Saxon idea and it died.

We have now found out that President Obama is collecting another $400,000 for another speech.  This is in addition to the hundreds of millions he and his wife will get from their book.  (This is already guaranteed.)  If you do not see how the joke is on us, then all is over for America.

We Have a New President

President Donald Trump is now the American President of all of the American citizens, even those who did not vote for him.  That is what legitimacy implies.  What is ironic is that this is exactly what the Democrat party is trying to take away from him: legitimacy.  They tried the same with President George Bush from the beginning to the end of his two terms.  Remember that they cannot attack his policies, as they could not attack Bush's policy because the American people has voted for factually both policies.  They voted against the Obamas of this world and against Clintons of the world.  

The one thing that was left is legitimacy and that is what the anti-Trumpers have locked on to.  Attacking his legitimacy.  If they attacked his policies, which they would like to, they would be attacking the American people.

What is truly funny is that I was one of the original supporters of Trump.  It was me and Ann Coulter, when he first announced, who said he would become president.

Related articles

Trump scoffs at protesters, asks if they voted

Donald Trump Officially Wins Presidency after Congress Tallies Electoral College Votes

I Will be the Greatest Jobs Producer that God ever Created -- Trump

Why Obama and His Democrat Party Continues to Hate Jews

Michael Oren knows the details well and the secrets well.  He was Israel's ambassador to the United States for four years.  He is now a member of Israel's parliament.  The following is his final plea to "rescue" the Jews of Israel. 

How would you vote if your children's lives were at stake? | Michael Oren | The Blogs | The Times of Israel.

In the administration, and with Democrats generally, it will fall on deaf ears.  It is the same as it was before and during the Holocaust.  There are always excuses not to act to save the Jews.  Obama is the leading anti-Semite; but not the only one and he could not do this on his own.  There are many Court Jews who love their position and are going along with him -- in full support. 

Thankfully, there are still some exceptions in the Democrat party:  Mendez of NJ, Cardin of MD, Schumer of NY, among others; but not many.  Whenever push has come to shove.  That is putting your vote in for the Jews, it has been the Republican party that has stood with Israel, by the way and Blacks too.  What is interesting is that neither group has given credit to the Republican party for it electorally.

It is now done.  The Jews for Democrat are to go through another death threat they have not experience since Germany in the 1930's to 40's.   That is ok with Obama.  He has always hated Jews who do not toe his line and are able to defend themselves.  Just look at his history.  The sole difference today is that there is an Israel, a wholly Jewish Nation/State, and its Israel Defense Forces (IDF).  The IDF is a bunch of Jews with loaded guns etc.  That will make the Obamas of this world think twice about attacking Jews.  Jews can now defend themselves with bullets and kill the Progressives as they should have done with the Germans.  

Trump is Returning America to its Rightful Owners.

As funny as it may seem Trump is returning America to its Anglo-Saxon roots.  The United States is a Christian and British country.  That is what gave it its values and belief in its exceptional-ism.  That is now about to become a reality again.  We have spent eight or more years trying to deny this truth even by electing a complete none American in Barak Obama.  It did not work out.  It is as though the last twelve years did not happen.  

It was worth everything to see the "end of the world" face on Michelle Obama.  She was the biggest looser, now that could be a TV show.  She can now go back to being the down trodden suffering minority she always liked portraying.

Why Are Any Democrats Showing Up For Trump's Inauguration?

There are currently over thirty Democrat Congress people not coming to the Trump inauguration because either he is not a legitimate president or because his dissed Congressman Lewis.  See the following article:

http://www.wsj.com/articles/more-democratic-legislators-plan-on-sitting-out-trumps-swearing-in-1484502998

Why are any of this not normal humans showing up?  That should be the mystery and a funny one at that.  Yes, the Democrat party, from Obama on down do not think that the so called election of Trump is legitimate.  For that matter, they did not think his candidacy was even legitimate.  Now, too many love him because he won.  Winning makes you friends; but, not real ones.  By the way, are any of them moving to Canada?  Or are they like all the rest of the anti=Trump movers so racist that they will not go to Mexico, even when they are bluffing.  

Remember, Hollywood, and the Democrat Party are the lowest racist and people who exist in this nation.

Related articles

Obama declines to comment on Democrats boycotting Trump's inauguration: 'All I know is I'm going to be there'

Indiana Governor Mike Pence (or Mitch Daniels) Ulikely to be the 2016 GOP Candidate

There have recently been a number of articles looking at Mike Pence as the dark-horse of GOP presidential politics.  There seems to be little discussion that this is unlikely.  An example of such a perception, of Pence as the "dark-horse" of GOP presidential politics,  is the following article:

5 reasons Mike Pence might be the 2016 dark horse to watch | The Daily Caller.

I know the aricle has a number of qualifiers.  They always do.  But why consider him at all?  There is even talk of former Governor Mitch Daniels being the GOP candidate.  Both Pence and Daniels are political and personal friends and supporters.  What is true of one slides right along with the other.  He, Daniels, is President of Purdue University, establishing his credentials and biding his time for 2016.  The idea for Daniels' run is his reputation as a cost cutter and, by 2016, his problems with his wife and marriage will be old history.  Daniels, so the argument goes reestablish his credentials with his "new" developments in higher education, which would help Republicans in that arena.

Governor Pence is doing the same; but, in the Governor's seat rather than higher education.  Both can in fact sit out the 2016 race and run in 2020, well employed and probably improving their positions.  Although, I would argue that by 2020 they would not be in any better position.  The problems they have today, as GOP candidates, will remain.

The question though is this all fantasy thinking on the part of the GOP or is there any real substance behind it.  Mike Pence in his role as Governor of Indiana and Mitch Daniels in his role as a Big-10 university president, both entered their new positions espousing conservative and traditional values.  One for the state level and the other for traditional and real higher education.  Governor Mike Pence came in with, what he himself claimed, an uncompromising position of having a voter mandate to provide the taxpayers a 10% rebate on the total funds collected by the State.  It did not happen.  The conservative principle here is that the State was in too much of people's lives and there was a need to reign in the State of Indiana Government, somewhat on the Texas model.  It did not happen.  Although Pence's party had complete control of the Indiana House and Senate, he could not or would not make it happen.  Partial principles are not principles.

Daniels did the same thing.  He came in with a memorandum to the Purdue family full of desire to really bring higher education and its lack of constitutional rights into the principled life of the American Constitution.  When he got some push back, he retreated or gave up.  He even argued, in a column, that the Foundation of Individual Rights in Education, FIRE, would give Purdue a green light on his new policies to constitutional protections.  He said the measure of his success, just as Pence said the 10% rebate would be, is FIRE upgrade of Purdue's policy in regards to the First Amendment.  So far, FIRE and the AAUP have only criticized his primary rejection of his own memo and his lack of defense of any rights.  Why would any conservative vote for these individuals in a primary?

That is the problem with both of them.  It is the usual talking a good game; but no substantive actions.  There has been plenty of that seen with the current president.  Pence and Daniels are showing that there is not a substantive difference in their actions.  It is probably true that they both can show that they are better administrators and managers in government than the current president.  That will not get an election won.

They also electorally do not bring anything to the table.  Indiana will go to the GOP candidate in the presidential race.  Neither Pence or Daniels can help with other states in improving the GOP electoral map.  The GOP needs to do itself a favor and to stop looking for the "dark horses."  The GOP needs to concentrate on its conservative principles and values to win -- which it can.  They need to ensure that everyone understands that it is the conservative position that make most people Americans and it is why immigrants come to America in the first place.

Related articles

Look to the governors in 2016

Pence earns high marks in GOP polls

How Totalitarian will Mitch Daniels Allow Purdue University to Get?

Which Mitch Daniels Will Show Up Monday as President of Purdue University?

• Indiana Governor Pence Defiles Democracy (dianeravitch.net)
• Governor Pence To Give GOP Address Saturday (indianapublicmedia.org)
• How Did Oman's Bayan College Become Purdue's Newest Regional Campus? (speakingtruthtopower.blogs.com)
• Daniels Seeks To Boost STEM Fields, Purdue's Online Classes (indianapublicmedia.org)