When truth offends political correctness, political correctness depends on power to enforce its Fascism. Today's educational and political institutions are the center of barbarism. This blog is dedicated to enlightening, i.e. exposing to the light of reason, false correctness that result in depravity and demise of civilized behavior. Reason is the Western civility's final stand against barbarism to survive in the new world of the Twenty-First Century. When one sees the lies, hypocrisy, thought by slogans, of those who would end freedom, one can only laugh at the comedy. The emperor does not have any clothes and this blog's goal is to laugh at his nakedness. (All opinions are strictly my own and do not in anyway reflect or imply any concurrence or support from Purdue University.)
Read what the funny man, who claimed to be President of the United States, is now doing for all our disbelief in him, and American politicians, and our funny bone by his own acceleration. Regretfully it is what we believed all of our politicians were, thieves and charlatans, has now been proven our without a shadow of a doubt and there is no going back. Just read:
If I did not see this myself, I could not make this up. I always knew he was a fraud. He was as they say a politician who never ever did anything in his life. Ever, and it can not be longer than that. He still to this day has not. That is still so sad. We had our first Black president and who hurt the most? This is truly funny, the Blacks. Again, you cannot make this up.
Who did the best? The gays. Make up your own funny story of why this is the case.
How could we ever, ever have a president like Barack Obama? Only the demise of the American people can explain it. History will for ever write that the end of the United States as a beacon to other countries, the new Israel, died with the election of Barack Obama and the end of Americanism. It is, that is Americanism, and Anglo-Saxon idea and it died.
We have now found out that President Obama is collecting another $400,000 for another speech. This is in addition to the hundreds of millions he and his wife will get from their book. (This is already guaranteed.) If you do not see how the joke is on us, then all is over for America.
Professor Kamalipour is a Muslim who has an ongoing relationship, paid for by Indiana Tax Payers with Tehran University. Not only was he born and spend most of his upbringing in Iran; he has continued to enjoy the support of the Iranian Mullahs and most anti-American Iranians, if not other Muslims with the equivalant agenda. Otherwise, how would it be possible for him to go back and forth between America and Iran without some one questioning his intention -- on either side of the equation.
The following is a direct quote from him, in a Muslim journal of the problems of the world.
"My realisation, as a person who has travelled to more than 50 countries, is that different societies are more alike than different. The more I travel the more I realise
this fact. The need of the hour is to get along with one another and,make friendship, and networks based on mutual respect and under-
standing. The cause of majority of existing global problems is mere
ignorance."
He completely ignores the acts of Muslims in killing Jews and Christians. He is the justifier of Islamic hatred and death squads against women, Jews, Gays, Christians, and other infidels. He defends by his statements and actions the beheading and hanging in Iran of all Gays and Lesbians. He would seem to be a great supporter of the misogynistic beliefs of Islam. He never says otherwise. He never criticizes the actions of his fellow Iranians.
According to Prof. Yahya Kamalipour all the problems with Islam are just a matter of misunderstanding and have a moral equivalency to Christians and Jews. A stand which is at its core anti-American and yet still funded by American taxpayers. What he says in America is not what he can or does say in Iran. How will Iran deal with him if they knew that most of his American supporters were homosexuals. How will the middle-east Muslims interact with him because he has lied about his association with homosexuals, women, Jews, etc.
I do not fault these various groups. They are all good courageous people. It is Professor Kamalipour who continuous his fraud of advancing himself on the backs of the oppressed.
It is time that Hoosier tax payers informed Purdue University that there is a limit to anti-American behavior, even from academics.
To either support his own guilt feelings or to accommodate the gay marriage lobby or because of pressure from his son and/or his wife Republican Congressman Rob Portman has turned the meaning of marriage and libertarianism on its head. See the following confused explanation of his new stance:
I cannot claim to know what is going on in Portman's head; but, I can evaluate what he says publicly and the policy stand he takes. The libertarian position can only be defined as one where the state has nothing to do with marriage. It would be fine and justifiable if he had taken that position and said that he had "re-thought" the question now that his son is at Yale and gay that state policy should say nothing about marriage. Here he would be saying that government should get out of any recognition of, or any involvement with, marriage. That would not be a stand for "gay marriage" or any definition of marriage. It would be saying that people should be allowed to live as they want and with whom they want to and it is not the state's business.
But, Portman does make it the state's business.
If the state is going to recognize marriage, from a conservative point of view (and a libertarian one), it can only be because the state recognizes some overwhelming state, or societal interest. These interests must at least be in the area of survival and/or national, i.e. state, security. Nothing here would lead someone, under any circumstance, to support "gay marriage." And neither can Representative Portman.
The state has for a long time recognized marriage as exclusively between one man and one women because of long standing historical and religious reasons. Today under this theory it would be legitimate to exclude "gay marriage" under conservative concepts; but not under libertarian ones. Libertarian concepts would at best say that there is no place for the state to be in the marriage definition business. There are many, many definitions of marriage. Why would one or two take precedence over all the rest?
This is Portman's betrayal and the lie presented by his son. It is also the lie which most gay activist present.
The only, and I mean only, reason that the state can justify in having an interest in marriage is national suicide as it relates to national security. There is nothing in being a conservative or a libertarian that requires an individual or a society to commit suicide. Therefore the one and sole state interest in marriage is the consequence of that coupling, which is more children. Only the increase in fertility, i.e. new babies, justifies and explains the state's interest in marriage. Under these principles, there would be greater justification for polygamy than there is from gay marriage. (All states have a greater justification for polygamy than gay marriage; although, there are other social problems with polygamy.)
All these couplings have minimal advantage or no advantage to fertility: gay marriage, bestiality, general fetishes, co-habitation, marriage to inanimate objects, etc. As a consequence, the state cannot and should not have anything to say, as far as policy, about these.
Portman, understandably as a bereaved father, has turned state policy on its head when it comes to gay marriage. He not only betrayed his principles; he also stood the conservative and libertarian cause on its head. There is no reason for him to continue in politics representing conservative/libertarian ideas.
