Comical Politics

Muslims take charge of Egypt

Here is what happens when Muslims get in charge of a country and by bad luck or misplaced idealism there happens to be Americans there.  The goal of the Muslim religion, at this time in history (i.e. the past 300 yeas), is to disgrace the West and in particularly, America.  (Actually Israel is first; but America is a close second.  For Ossama though, America was always first.)

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/feb/5/egypt-sends-43-ngo-workers-including-19-americans-/.

As the article above points out, Americans working for NGOs in Egypt will go to trial just to embarass the United States, especially when one of them is the son of an American Cabinet member, Secretary LaHood. 

Elderly, 94 year old, woman asked to remove adult diaper during TSA search

A woman has filed a complaint with federal authorities over how her elderly mother was treated at Northwest Florida Regional Airport last weekend.

via www.newsherald.com

This should finally speak to the fact that what is necessary is religious, ethnic, and racial profiling. This will be the only way to get to the terrorists. Know who you are dealing with first. It is not the "adult diaper" that is the threat, it is the nature of the person and their associates that matters. 

Why is it that Americans cannot understand than when a 90 year old Muslim women with adult diapers is going on a plane with her 5 young adult male Muslim relatives it is a problem to be checked.  A 90+ year old lady from Dustin, Florida who is probably Christian IS NOT A PROBLEM.

That is why the TSA has can never prevent terrorism in the sky.  Only make the rest of America suffer.   Focus on the terrorist; not he means.  There are infinite number of means; but, only a finite number of terrorist profiles.

 

The Arab Spring that was Always an Expected Winter

Who came up with the bright idea that there was and "Arab Spring."  That is right, of course, the American Government of President Obama did.  It has always been an oxymoron that was ignored for "political correctness" sake.  Spring and Arabs, i.e. Muslims, is like talking about friendly cobra snakes.  There is no such thing.  To see how this "spring" is turning out in Egypt, read the following article:
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2011/06/13/115722/egypt-military-7000-civilians.html.

More Egyptians are incarcerated, there is no freedom for society, no democracy, and no rights; only vengeance against the loosing tribe.  Egypt is under the greatest influence of Islam as a terrorist religion than it has ever been, with no countervailing force.  By definition all the Arab countries who are going into this "spring" are coming out the other end in the "winter" of human existence.  Every Arab country is by law and constitution an Islamic State, a strict one religion country,  this includes Iraq's and Afghanistan's new constitutions, which were written with American assistance.  This is the real joke.

Arabs are only friends of Arabs.  (If you doubt that ask any Hindu.)  There is no option in the Arab world of supporting so called human rights.  The only place that it came close was in Turkey (I know it is not Arab; but, it is Muslim.)  With this last Turkish election, all that is over with and Turkey will slowly become the extreme Muslim state it has always wanted to be.  When will the Christian and Jewish killing restart there?  In a week, a month, a year?  Which one is better for the liberal Christians and Jews?

Inadvertently, you and I know it must happen.  Just as this is going on for the Coptic Christians of Egypt under the new "Arab Spring."  What is sad is to see everyone so quiet.  Where are the Jews of the Holocaust?  Where are the so-called caring Christians?  They must be too busy praying and socializing. 

I would love for someone to prove me wrong.  I just never seems to happen.

Islamic Organizations "Share al-Qaeda Ideology'

In spite of the current Muslim friendly Obama administration's denial, all studies and reviews, including the current one in England shows that there is not substantive difference concerning the goals of "good" Muslims and "bad" Muslims.  In the following article of a study commissioned by the British Government, the only difference is the belief in which method is more effective.

Mainstream Islamic organizations 'share al-Qaeda ideology'.

Islam wants the end of the the West, in particular Christianity (the Jews are also included; but they are small and Islam's heroes showed that you can kill a third of all Jews in just a couple of years).  Islam is clear in that there is no room in there theology for alternative religions.  The sad part about America's activity is that they really believe that all "ideas" can be "liberally" treated.  It is a fact that some ideas as just mutually exclusive and cannot be accommodated.  Islam is one such idea. 

If the terrorist had been a Christian

If the terrorist had been a Christian.  This is an opinion piece about what would have happened in Detroit if the terrorist was a Christian, never mind if he had acted out of his Christian beliefs.  (That is somewhat of an oxymoron since there are no Christian beliefs that fit this kind of action -- actually quite the opposite.)

It is true that all Muslims are not terrorists in 2010, but all terrorists ARE Muslims.  The only reality that is possible is to not allow Muslims to fly.  It is now up to Muslims to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that they should be allowed to board planes with other human beings.

It is not the responsibility of the rest of humanity to prove a negative, which is that this particular Muslims bears us no harm.  One of the central problem of civilization in the 21st Century is that Muslims and Islam generally has refused on all levels to take responsibility for their actions.  And, unlike Christian and Jewish believers they are not held to any level of responsibility by others.

It should now be very clear that one cannot ever stop the means of carrying out terrorist attacks, they can only be stopped by going to the source.  By profiling the ones who are willing to commit terrorism to go to a better place.  Profiling always works. 

Political correctness (PC), especially in the United States, has harmed, and continues to harm, our national security.  There is no question about that.  Look at Ft. Hood and the flight in Detroit.  There is only one solution: go to the source.  This has been the ONLY way to stop terrorism.  Otherwise expect that Americans and many Westerners will die in the future for the sake, and solely for the sake, of PC

Krauthammer: Giving KSM The Rights Of An American Citizen is Unconscionable

Krauthammner gives the best analysis of why it is time to impeach Holder as Attorney General.  His combination of American hatred to allow a show trial against America and his lack of understanding of the American Constitution and legal system makes him a pitiful U.S. Attorney General. 

Krauthammer: Giving KSM The Rights Of An American Citizen is Unconscionable.

After you see the video you will understand why Obama now has to get rid of Holder.  The sad thing is I believe that Obama is behind all this.  (At least when he is not busy bowing to foreign royalty.  Will someone please tell him that he is an American, at least in name.  OK that is a joke; but true.)

'Islam not responsible' for Fort Hood massacre: US imam

'Islam not responsible' for Fort Hood massacre: US imam.

This is the imam where the muslim terrorist prayed.  The terrorist was never quite even to his fellow officers, or his military patients, about how he felt about Americans the United States, and none Muslims generally.  He talked about killing them hating them.  To accept that the only one who did not know was the imam or any of his fellow Keilien, Texas Muslims is beyond credibility.

His motives are not questionable.  He did exactly what every good Muslim is suppose to do who interprets and understands Islam as he did.  This includes most Muslims and most Islamic Countries.  His behavior is consistant with Muslim behavior generally. 

Free-Ride Given to Muslim death squad by American News Organizations

The American mainline news organizations have been the main source of legitimizing, covering, and hiding the greatest threat to America and to Americanism: American Islamist.  The American media has been hiding and covering for terrorist Muslims, which is an exceeding large majority of young Muslims in this Country. 

The mainline news organizations are afraid of political correctness and therefore turn their eyes and ears away when Muslim terrorism happens, even to one of their own.

This is the case of the Oakland, California newspaper editor, Chauncey Bailey, who was gunned down my Muslim terrorist on the street.  There is no question of who did it or why.   It was certified home grown Muslims and he was gunned down broad daylight for investigating the terrorist activity of these Muslims.  He leaves behind a wife and two children.

This is very reminiscent, almost a repeat, of the assassination of the Dutch filmmaker for daring to make a documentary critical of Islam, although it was accurate.

Assassination of newspaper reporters is rare in the United States.  It is crossing a line that make America by definition uncivilized, a third-world banana republic.  Nonetheless, the news organizations of America would not report the story.

It was finally broken an made public by newspapers in England.  Nonetheless it was still ignored until conservative talk shows and bloggers came out and told America the truth.  The truth that this was a Muslim terrorist attack that assassinated a newspaper reporter. 

The first timid reports in the American press began to appear; but, they would not mention that the assassination was by Muslim terrorists.  It would seem like an unrelated death, even possibly a day-to-day murder that happens in Oakland.  No this one was different.  It was the day to day killing by Muslim terrorist that happen all the time all over the world.

Finally the Chicago Tribune newspaper wrote about the story in today's paper.  A front page story, a story about the gunning down of an American newspaper man for the story he was investigating.  An event so rare and in the interest of the newspaper people because it was one of their own.  But it was Muslim terrorism so all civilized norms go out the window.  The Chicago Tribune took over three weeks to report the story that was readily available in England two weeks ago.  The newsroom staff of the Chicago Tribune should be ashamed of themselves; but they were finally embarrassed and shamed enough by the conservative press and radio to print the following story:

Chicago Tribune story on Oakland newspaper editor gunned down by Muslims

Remember it has been over thirty years since a black newspaper reporter has been killed investigating a story, this is rare.  We all should be scared, worried, and on watch for all Muslim activities.  They need to prove their legitimacy and their willingness to live in a civilized society; it is not the duty of the rest of us to "presume" their tolerance until proved otherwise.

That is how the courts work and will work for the Muslim assassin; it is not how a civilized society works.

Australia has Found the Guts

Debate in Australia.
This is true and can be checked at:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/religion/australia.asp

Muslims who want to live under Islamic Sharia law were told on Wednesday to get out of Australia, as the government targeted radicals in a bid to head off potential terror attacks.  A day after a group of mainstream Muslim leaders pledged loyalty to Australia and her Queen at a special meeting with Prime Minister John Howard, he and his Ministers made it clear that extremists would face a crackdown.  Treasurer Peter Costello, seen as heir apparent to Howard, hinted that some radical clerics could be asked to leave the country if they did not accept that Australia was a secular state, and its laws were
made by parliament.  "If those are not your values, if you want a country which has Sharia law or a theocratic state, then Australia is not for you", he said on National Television "I'd be saying to clerics
who are teaching that there are two laws governing people in Australia: one the Australian law and another Islamic law that is false. If you can't agree with parliamentary law, independent courts, democracy, and
would prefer Sharia law and have the opportunity to go to another country, which practices it, perhaps, then, that's a better option", Costello said.  Asked whether he meant radical clerics would be forced
to leave, he said those with dual citizenship could possibly be asked to move to the other country. Education Minister Brendan Nelson later told reporters that Muslims who did not want to accept local values should "clear off. 

Basically people who don't want to be Australians, and who don't want, to live by Australian values and understand them, well then, they can basically clear off", he said.  Separately, Howard angered some
Australian Muslims on Wednesday by saying he supported spy agencies monitoring the nation's mosques.  Quote:  "IMMIGRANTS, NOT AUSTRALIANS, MUST ADAPT. Take It Or Leave It.  I am tired of this nation worrying about whether we are offending some individual or their culture. Since the terrorist attacks on Bali, we have experienced a surge in patriotism by the majority of Australians."  "However, the dust from the attacks had barely settled when the 'politically correct' crowd began complaining about the possibility that our patriotism was offending others. I am not against immigration, nor do I hold a grudge against anyone who is seeking a better life by coming to Australia."  "However, there are a few things that those who have recently come to our country, and apparently some born here, need to understand."  "This idea of Australia being a multi-cultural community has served only to dilute our sovereignty and our national identity. And as Australians, we have our own culture, our own society, our own language and our own lifestyle."  "This culture has been developed over two centuries of struggles, trials
and victories by millions of men and women who have sought freedom"  "We speak mainly ENGLISH, not Spanish, Lebanese, Arabic, Chinese, Japanese, Russian, or any other language. Therefore, if you wish to become part of our society .. Learn the language!"

"Most Australians believe in God. This is not some Christian, right wing, political push, but a fact, because Christian men and women, on Christian principles, founded this nation, and this is clearly
documented.   It is certainly appropriate to display it on the walls of our schools. If God offends you, then I suggest you consider another part of the world as your new home, because God is part of our culture."  "We will accept your beliefs, and will not question why.  All we ask is that you accept ours, and live in harmony and peaceful enjoyment with us."  "If the Southern Cross offends you, or you don't like "A Fair Go", then you should seriously consider a move to another part of this planet.  We are happy with our culture and have no desire to change, and we really don't care how you did things where you came from. By all means, keep your culture, but do not force it on others.

"This is OUR COUNTRY, OUR LAND, and OUR LIFESTYLE, and we will allow you every opportunity to enjoy all this. But once you are done complaining, whining, and griping about Our Flag, Our Pledge, Our
Christian beliefs, or Our Way of Life, I highly encourage you take advantage of one other great Australian freedom, 'THE RIGHT TO LEAVE'."  "If you aren't happy here then LEAVE. We didn't force you to come here.  You asked to be here. So accept the country YOU accepted."

The Australians have found the guts to "speak truth to power" and to end the political correctness fostered on Americans by overblown intellectuals.  This is the courage that neither party candidates for President are showing in the United States; but it is what the people want to hear.  It is time to end the debate on immigrants and Muslims.  The value of multi-culturalism and diversity is the "big lie" of the past twenty-years.  The United States has never been a multi-cultural society in the way that it is being implemented and there is no evidence that there is any positive, social or economic, value to multi-culturalism or diversity.  The problem is the same; none acceptance of the Judeo-Christian morality and Anglican norms.  Their culture is anti-American that is why they are here not in their home country.  More significantly and often overlooked is that unlike other immigrant waves in the past, both of these new groups are overwhelming in numbers and procreation.  Like locusts they are and will overwhelm every culture and society they come in contact with just by shear numbers.

For future action and attitudes we need to take a page from the Australians and learn what it is to stand up for one's self.  We lost the war on terrorism the day after the war when President George Bush made the United States into a false multi-cultural society by raising Islam, alone, to an equal level with the Judeo-Christian tradition.  This the Australians know better.

As documented by the Chicago Tribune last year and by the FBI in their ongoing investigations and indictments the center of the radicalism of Islam in the U.S. is Chicago.  Dearborn, Michigan, with a larger Muslim (but older) community, may have issues, some of which one may disagree with, but most of that Muslim community there consists of American-Muslims that considers themselves American first, with all that it means.  (In some cases more American than some "American" intellectuals of multi-culturalism we all know.)

The radical Muslim's and the illegal Hispanic's goal, intentional or accidental, is to end all the values that make America worth while and worth fighting and dying for.  It is one thing to criticize policy, which all Americans (residents or citizens), are encouraged to do; it is another thing to demand that the very culture and society that you came to by choice change to fit the society and culture you ran away from.

One, it is empirically wrong that there is not an American standing above all else.  Two, it is immoral; becaue the level of acceptable morality in practice in America by far exceeds all other countries combined.  (This does not say it is perfect; only relatively so.)  Three, it is not polite, which is the Anglo-Saxon way of saying shut-up or get out of my house.

"Moderate" Muslims -- Where are you?

OUTRAGED MUSLIMS!  OH MY!

We wake up this morning to see video on CNN showing rampaging Muslims around the world.  In Europe, the Middle East, the Pacific Rim ...  Muslim Mobs spreading mayhem.  It seems that these mighty mad Muslims are rioting and firing their ever-present AK-47s into the air because of cartoons.  Yup ... this latest epidemic of Muslim outrage comes to us because some newspapers in Norway and Denmark published some cartoons depicting Mohammed.   

This one is one of the best one produced.

Given the kind of celebrating that occurs in most Muslim countries, one must admit that this turban/bomb thing could be the next big fashion hit on the Muslim street! And why not? It actually does reflect the actions and beliefs of many Muslims, even if they are called "Islamo-fascists or whatever. The cartoon is even a further correct reflection of what so called moderate Muslims claim they view this group.

Muslim outrage huh.  OK ... let's do a little historical review.  Just some lowlights:

• Muslims fly commercial airliners into buildings in New York City.  No Muslim outrage.

• Muslim officials block the exit where school girls are trying to escape a burning building because their faces were exposed.  No Muslim outrage.

• Muslims cut off the heads of three teenaged girls on their way to school in Indonesia.  A Christian school.  No Muslim outrage.

• Muslims murder teachers trying to teach Muslim children in Iraq.  No Muslim outrage.

• Muslims murder over 80 tourists with car bombs outside cafes and hotels in Egypt.  No Muslim outrage.

• A Muslim attacks a missionary children's school in India.  Kills six.  No Muslim outrage.

• Muslims slaughter hundreds of children and teachers in Beslan, Russia.  Muslims shoot children in the back.  No Muslim outrage.

• Let's go way back.  Muslims kidnap and kill athletes at the Munich Summer Olympics.  No Muslim outrage.

• Muslims fire rocket-propelled grenades into schools full of children in Israel.  No Muslim outrage.

• Muslims murder more than 50 commuters in attacks on Londonsubways and busses.  Over 700 are injured.  No Muslim outrage.

• Muslims massacre dozens of innocents at a Passover Seder.  No Muslim outrage.

• Muslims murder innocent vacationers in Bali.  No Muslim outrage.

• Muslim newspapers publish anti-Semitic cartoons.  No Muslim outrage

• Muslims are involved, on one side or the other, in almost every one of the 125+ shooting wars around the world.  No Muslim outrage.

• Muslims beat the charred bodies of Western civilians with their shoes, then hang them from a bridge.  No Muslim outrage.

• Newspapers in Denmark and Norway publish cartoons depicting Mohammed.  Muslims are outraged.

Dead children.  Dead tourists.  Dead teachers.  Dead doctors and nurses.  Death, destruction and mayhem around the world at the hands of Muslims .. no Muslim outrage ... but publish a cartoon depicting Mohammed with a bomb in his turban and all hell breaks loose.

Come on, is this really about cartoons?  They're rampaging and burning flags.  They're looking for Europeans to kidnap.  They're  threatening innkeepers and generally raising holy Muslim hell not because of any outrage over a cartoon.  They're outraged because it is part of the Islamic jihadist culture to be outraged.  You don't really need a reason.  You just need an excuse.  Wandering around, destroying property, murdering children, firing guns into the air and feigning outrage over the slightest perceived insult is to a jihadist what tailgating is to a Steeler's fan.

I know and understand that these bloodthirsty murderers do not represent the majority of the world's Muslims.  When, though, do they become outraged?  When do they take to the streets to express their outrage at the radicals who are making their religion the object of worldwide hatred and ridicule?  Islamic writer Salman Rushdie wrote of these silent Muslims  in a New York Times article three years ago.  "As their ancient, deeply civilized culture of love, art and philosophical reflection is hijacked by paranoiacs, racists, liars, male supremacists, tyrants, fanatics and violence junkies, why are they not screaming?" 

Indeed.  Why not?