Comical Politics

The End of Chicago's Police Chief

If he had not retired he would have to be fired.  If nothing else to show that the new Mayor is doing something.  That is what Chicago police have been like under the Democrats and their so called police chief.  Always have been ever since the Dalys who were kind of Democrats but not when it came to Chicago.  Remember there is nothing that is American that the Democrats have not destroyed. Then came the real Democrats, after the Daleys, to Chicago and they are still there.  Evey one who can is leaving Chicago and Cook County where the Democrats reign.  Most Blacks are not bright enough, there are exceptions, to see that they are and have been taken advantage of by the Democrats for their, the Democrats, personnel gain.  That is ALL the Democrats care about.

The police department under this superintend or the previous one have not done anything, and I mean anything, to change any criminality in Chicago.  It have only gotten worse, much worse.  The Chicago police department have been unable to kick butt and take names from the people who should not walk the ground of the City of Chicago.  That is one of the big reason people are leaving.  The policing in Chicago is worse than bad.  You do not go for any week-end without a lot of people being shot and killed.  Thanks to the police superintendent and the Mayor of Chicago.  It is good he set a retirement date so that the Mayor would not have to fire him.  He is so bad; not one wants him.  But let us not forget he is a minority.  The white superintendent before him did not do any better.  It is all the Mayor's, all of them, fault.  NYC is following in its footsteps.  He had to be fired because the Democrats are so so bad.  They have never ever cared about what is happening to minorities of any kind.  All Democrats care about is their own ability to hold power and make money for themselves.  Nothing else.  I would challenge anyone to show me where they cared about anything their big mouths spoke about.  Including killing of minorities in Chicago.  Remember, Obama never came to Chicago.  This is unlike Trump.

It is all very funny what the Democrats continue to do to what was once America's premier cities.

Why Obama is Such a Funny, if not Sad, Politician?

Read what the funny man, who claimed to be President of the United States, is now doing for all our disbelief in him, and American politicians, and our funny bone by his own acceleration.  Regretfully it is what we believed all of our politicians were, thieves and charlatans, has now been proven our without a shadow of a doubt and there is no going back.  Just read:

http://www.smh.com.au/comment/barack-obama-seemed-different-but-hes-just-another-moneygrubbing-politician-20170427-gvu4c4.html

If I did not see this myself, I could not make this up.  I always knew he was a fraud.  He was as they say a politician who never ever did anything in his life.  Ever, and it can not be longer than that.  He still to this day has not.  That is still so sad.  We had our first Black president and who hurt the most?  This is truly funny, the Blacks.  Again, you cannot make this up.  

Who did the best?  The gays.  Make up your own funny story of why this is the case.  

How could we ever, ever have a president like Barack Obama?  Only the demise of the American people can explain it.  History will for ever write that the end of the United States as a beacon to other countries, the new Israel, died with the election of Barack Obama and the end of Americanism.  It is, that is Americanism, and Anglo-Saxon idea and it died.

We have now found out that President Obama is collecting another $400,000 for another speech.  This is in addition to the hundreds of millions he and his wife will get from their book.  (This is already guaranteed.)  If you do not see how the joke is on us, then all is over for America.

We Have a New President

President Donald Trump is now the American President of all of the American citizens, even those who did not vote for him.  That is what legitimacy implies.  What is ironic is that this is exactly what the Democrat party is trying to take away from him: legitimacy.  They tried the same with President George Bush from the beginning to the end of his two terms.  Remember that they cannot attack his policies, as they could not attack Bush's policy because the American people has voted for factually both policies.  They voted against the Obamas of this world and against Clintons of the world.  

The one thing that was left is legitimacy and that is what the anti-Trumpers have locked on to.  Attacking his legitimacy.  If they attacked his policies, which they would like to, they would be attacking the American people.

What is truly funny is that I was one of the original supporters of Trump.  It was me and Ann Coulter, when he first announced, who said he would become president.

Related articles

Trump scoffs at protesters, asks if they voted

Donald Trump Officially Wins Presidency after Congress Tallies Electoral College Votes

I Will be the Greatest Jobs Producer that God ever Created -- Trump

Indiana Governor Mike Pence (or Mitch Daniels) Ulikely to be the 2016 GOP Candidate

There have recently been a number of articles looking at Mike Pence as the dark-horse of GOP presidential politics.  There seems to be little discussion that this is unlikely.  An example of such a perception, of Pence as the "dark-horse" of GOP presidential politics,  is the following article:

5 reasons Mike Pence might be the 2016 dark horse to watch | The Daily Caller.

I know the aricle has a number of qualifiers.  They always do.  But why consider him at all?  There is even talk of former Governor Mitch Daniels being the GOP candidate.  Both Pence and Daniels are political and personal friends and supporters.  What is true of one slides right along with the other.  He, Daniels, is President of Purdue University, establishing his credentials and biding his time for 2016.  The idea for Daniels' run is his reputation as a cost cutter and, by 2016, his problems with his wife and marriage will be old history.  Daniels, so the argument goes reestablish his credentials with his "new" developments in higher education, which would help Republicans in that arena.

Governor Pence is doing the same; but, in the Governor's seat rather than higher education.  Both can in fact sit out the 2016 race and run in 2020, well employed and probably improving their positions.  Although, I would argue that by 2020 they would not be in any better position.  The problems they have today, as GOP candidates, will remain.

The question though is this all fantasy thinking on the part of the GOP or is there any real substance behind it.  Mike Pence in his role as Governor of Indiana and Mitch Daniels in his role as a Big-10 university president, both entered their new positions espousing conservative and traditional values.  One for the state level and the other for traditional and real higher education.  Governor Mike Pence came in with, what he himself claimed, an uncompromising position of having a voter mandate to provide the taxpayers a 10% rebate on the total funds collected by the State.  It did not happen.  The conservative principle here is that the State was in too much of people's lives and there was a need to reign in the State of Indiana Government, somewhat on the Texas model.  It did not happen.  Although Pence's party had complete control of the Indiana House and Senate, he could not or would not make it happen.  Partial principles are not principles.

Daniels did the same thing.  He came in with a memorandum to the Purdue family full of desire to really bring higher education and its lack of constitutional rights into the principled life of the American Constitution.  When he got some push back, he retreated or gave up.  He even argued, in a column, that the Foundation of Individual Rights in Education, FIRE, would give Purdue a green light on his new policies to constitutional protections.  He said the measure of his success, just as Pence said the 10% rebate would be, is FIRE upgrade of Purdue's policy in regards to the First Amendment.  So far, FIRE and the AAUP have only criticized his primary rejection of his own memo and his lack of defense of any rights.  Why would any conservative vote for these individuals in a primary?

That is the problem with both of them.  It is the usual talking a good game; but no substantive actions.  There has been plenty of that seen with the current president.  Pence and Daniels are showing that there is not a substantive difference in their actions.  It is probably true that they both can show that they are better administrators and managers in government than the current president.  That will not get an election won.

They also electorally do not bring anything to the table.  Indiana will go to the GOP candidate in the presidential race.  Neither Pence or Daniels can help with other states in improving the GOP electoral map.  The GOP needs to do itself a favor and to stop looking for the "dark horses."  The GOP needs to concentrate on its conservative principles and values to win -- which it can.  They need to ensure that everyone understands that it is the conservative position that make most people Americans and it is why immigrants come to America in the first place.

Related articles

Look to the governors in 2016

Pence earns high marks in GOP polls

How Totalitarian will Mitch Daniels Allow Purdue University to Get?

Which Mitch Daniels Will Show Up Monday as President of Purdue University?

• Indiana Governor Pence Defiles Democracy (dianeravitch.net)
• Governor Pence To Give GOP Address Saturday (indianapublicmedia.org)
• How Did Oman's Bayan College Become Purdue's Newest Regional Campus? (speakingtruthtopower.blogs.com)
• Daniels Seeks To Boost STEM Fields, Purdue's Online Classes (indianapublicmedia.org)

How the American Tax Payer Was Taken for a Ride on New Years Day

The first thing I hear when someone reads about the new "fiscal cliff" tax bill is: "What do you mean there is additional spending in the bill?"  That is right.  Not only does it include pork barrel spending; but, also tax credits, i.e. cash, for the Democrat and Republican loved corporations.  Read the following column to understand the slight of hand as to how it got in there:
Tim Carney: How corporate tax credits got in the 'cliff' deal | .

What should be understood is that this was not a surprise to President Obama or to the White House.  They were part of the Halloween joke on the American citizens.  This has to be, in all aspects, one of the saddest new years in American history.  Americans have had sad new years but not where they were so badly betrayed by Congress.
The betrayal of the American public by its elected officials is huge and should start a recall, if not an impeachment process.  The only individuals who can be counted as "innocent" of this betrayal are the members of Congress who refused to vote for the charade.
Obama is not one of them.  The American people gotten taken by the worst lie, well one of them, by this president.  (He just spent an additional $7 million to return to his Hawaii vacation.)  When he auto-pen signed the bill, the White House released a "signing statement."  It said that Obama did not agree with everything that he signed; but, naturally he did not specify what he did not agree with.  This is the kind of cover that any low-life Chicago Style politicians uses to cover himself if needed.

One of the central facts that every American knows is that the problem with the American government is that it spends way beyond it means.  This has not been doubted by most Democrat or Republican Americans.  Much to each of their dismay, they find that the new bill which claims to reduce future debt and excessive spending will actually add $4 trillion dollars to the national debt, according to the Congressional Budget Office, over the next 10 years and increases spending by the government through credits and direct spending increases.

As is too often the case, when looked at in hind-sight it would have been far better for the American Government to be forced to go over the so called "fiscal cliff."  This "too big to fail" perception has led us Americans to accept trillions of dollars in spending on dubious projects we would never have sanely acquiesce to.  It is now time to call for an end.  Sadly, since this had nothing to do with creating jobs, we are going to see the economy remain flat and most Americans remain out of work or in minimal wage jobs.

Thank you Democrat and Republican elected officials.

Related articles

• "Fiscal cliff" bill had some hidden pork (cbsnews.com)
• A Look Behind The Curtain At The Fiscal Cliff Political Theater, The Joke's On You! (austrianaddict.com)
• How corporate tax credits got in the 'cliff' deal (imagineentpayroll.com)
• The Incredible $76 Billion in Tax Breaks Corporate Cronies Received via the "Fiscal Cliff" Bill (economicpolicyjournal.com)
• Senate Democrats Add a S**t Load of Pork to Sandy Bill (americanfreedombybarbara.com)
• Revealed: How Corporate Tax Credits Got in 'Cliff' Deal (12160.info)

Foreign election officials amazed by trust-based U.S. voting system

It is interesting that the following story is never reported by the mainstream media.
Foreign election officials amazed by trust-based U.S. voting system | The Cable.

It argues that the UN's election monitering team was overwhelmed at the level of trust that is at the center of America's electoral process.  How could this be the case when most progressives, i.e. Democrats, argue that the American electoral system is intentionally disenfranchising many possible voters?   The suspician is that most of the so called "disenfrancised" voters are really part of the 80 million registered voters who did not care enough to vote in the 2012 election. 

It is impossible to figure out a system to get them to vote.  Requireing them to vote, may work, but it rejects America's values of freedom of thought and action.   This should teach Americans that having to show a picture identification does not prevent anyone from voting.

Related articles

David L. Ober Wins State Representative in Indiana's 82nd District

Foreign election officials amazed by trust-based U.S. voting system

UN Poll-Watchers 'Amazed' US Doesn't Require ID's To Vote

Foreign election officials amazed by trust-based U.S. voting system

International Poll-Watchers 'Amazed' US Doesn't Require Photo-ID's To Vote

U.N. Poll Watchers Baffled U.S. Doesn't Require I.D. to Vote

There is Nothing Left But the Impeachment or Resignation of Obama

Democratic pollster Pat Caddell has finally broken out from the protective lies that have engulfed Obama.  I can no longer refer to him as "President" Obama since he has willfully rescinded that right when he slept soundly as our Ambassador and Seals were killed.  See the following emotional interview with him:

Can-You-Hear-Us-Now!: Pat Caddell on Jeanine Pirro 10/27/2012 Perfidious Media Threat To American People!.

What is harder to take is that the American media, led by the New York Times, is going out of its way to cover-up the Libya cowardice strictly for the desire that this coward be re-elected to office.  There is not an ounce of American backbone in this ingrate.

Related articles

• Pat Caddell Says: Media Have Become "Enemy of the American People" (genomega1.wordpress.com)
• Pat Caddell Drops The Hammer On Our Corrupt Media (minx.cc)
• DEM POLLSTER PAT CADDELL: MSM IS THREATENING FUTURE OF COUNTRY: "First of all, we've had 9 days... (pjmedia.com)
• 15. Media Have Become an "Enemy of the American people" : former Democratic pollster and analyst Pat Caddell (12160.info)
• Pat Caddell: 'Media Has Become An Enemy of the American People' (Video) (redalexandriava.com)
• [VIDEO] 'The media have become an enemy of the American people' (pjmedia.com)
• Benghazi Gate - Obama Admin & The Cover-up Continues - Judge Jeanine Pirro 10062012 (pumabydesign001.com)

Obama vs. Romney My Own Electoral Map Projections

I have projected for months that Romney will win by a landslide.  The following map shows my projections for this success.  The question will be is he going to win by this margin:

Obama vs. Romney Create Your Own Electoral Map.

or is Romney going to win in a landslide reminiscent of Ronald Reagan's 1980 and 1984 successes.  Ultimately, I believe it will be the later and for the same reasons.  The only ones who have a reason to vote for Carter or Obama are the "knee-jerks" who would vote for a Democrat under all and any circumstances.
Romney (or Reagan) never had a chance of convincing them.  The problem for Obama is that there are never enough "knee-jerks" to win an election on either side of the aisle.  Both Carter and Obama are ending their term with a national security/diplomatic disaster.  Iran for Carter and Libya (Benghazi) for Obama.  But, although it is difficult to argue that both were incompetent on the economy and national security matters, only Obama raises the question of cowardice under fire.  Only Obama can be legitimately viewed as a commander and chief without any courage.  By definition, that means the a majority of Americans will reject Obama in this coming election.  Not because they are Democrat, Republican, or independent; but, because they are Americans first.

Related articles

CNN shifts North Carolina to 'lean Romney'

Romney now leads Obama in projected electoral votes

The electoral map is flipping for Romney

Romney Pulls Ahead on Intrade's Electoral Map

Flash to Obama: Airbus Trounces Boeing with Another Record Order

Airbus trounces Boeing with another record order - Yahoo! Finance

And what does Obama do for Boeing? His wife, Michelle, is dancing with the carrot growers in South Africa while his NLRB is attacking Boeing's ability to lower production costs and is forcing Boeing to spend management time dealing with government bureaucrats and anti-business leftists of the Obama administration.

Barack Obama: The Weakest President in history? or Chicago Politics at Its Best?

As has  become clear, there is not a redeeming quality that Obama has as a President.  As much as I would have thought it impossible, he is making Jimmy Carter look like a passable president.  Just look at what the world press is saying, This is in the United Kingdom:

 Barack Obama: The Weakest President in history?.

But they are not the only ones.  Obama is viewed as indifferent and aloof in the United States.  He has not gone to bat for anything except his friend, the professor at Harvard, during Obama's past two years in office.  Everything that has been done, or so-called accomplished, was by Congress, a Democratic one at that.  All this happened without any of his help, input, or taking a stand of any kind.

What Obama and his wife have been primarily known for is dressing well, traveling, golfing and eating tones of lobster; that is they have been living the high-life, while ordinary Americans struggle.  The reality seems to look like a replay of the Beverly Hillbillies.   The Obamas seem to be the personification of the mountain folks who have just won the lottery.  The place you see this consistantly is in Chicago and Chicago politics, where winning a public office is akin to winning the lottery.   This type of politics encompasses all of Cook County and Northwest Indiana, i.e. East Chicago, Gary, and Hammond.  The lottery here is always a public office.

Now the Obama's have one the big lottery and they are acting accordingly.  This should not be a surprise.  That is Chicago politics.